Good afternoon. Will the captioner please test when you're able?
Can
we please have test captions when you're able? Thank you.
We see the test captions. Thank you.
Good
afternoon. Welcome, everyone.
I'd
like to go ahead and call the Health and Hospital Committee meeting to order at this time. I am Supervisor Otteley, Chair of this committee, along with Vice Chair Supervisor Margaret Abicoga.
With
both of us present, we have a quorum. So moving to public comment period, this is for the members of the Public Justice Committee on items not on the agenda. Then you can go ahead and speak at this time.
If
you're in person, please go pull a card and submit it.
And
if you're on Zoom, please raise your hands.
I
have no request to speak on item two.
Okay.
All right. We'll move on to item three, which is approval of the Consent Calendar and Changes Committee agenda.
Let's see.
So
on this one, I would like to request to place item number six on consent, which is a report from the Valley Health Plan relating to marketing and communication outcome measurements.
And
Vice Chair, do you have anything else? Changes to it? No.
Happy
to make a motion with a change of adding number six to the consent calendar.
All
right. I'll second that.
Do
we have any public on that item?
No
request to speak on item three.
Okay. Let's close. Let's close that and take a vote.
Vice
Chairperson Abacoga?
Aye.
Chairperson Lee?
Aye
as well.
Thank
you.
Good.
Then moving to item four, to receiving report on EMS system design concepts.
I believe we have Nick Clea, Director -in -Chief of Santa Clara County Emergency Medical Services Agency.
Good
afternoon.
Good
afternoon, Chair Lee and Supervisor Abacoga. And I'm joined by Assistant Director -in -Chief Mike Cabano and our Program Manager, Tony Doe.
Great.
Thank you.
Would you like to talk about, present,
I
mean, we have seen the report already. Do you have anything to add?
I
would just, if I may, Supervisor Lee, highlight a few elements of the report. I'm certainly happy to answer any questions you may have. Go ahead. Do
you want to speak about the highlights?
Yes.
So I think one of the key things we want to highlight in this report is the verbiage of EMS system review or EMS system design versus the verbiage of RFP.
So
we really are looking at designing the EMS system. And RFP is a component of that, but it's a transactional component within that system design. So you'll hear us use those words sometimes interchangeably, but really are looking at the overall EMS system review.
The
goal today really is to help ensure that we are sharing concepts with you. We are drafting that solicitation that is mentioned, but really it's at a high level as a goal today
to
go through the concepts, receive any feedback you and Supervisor Abacoga may have, and then really there may be some draft language. We have already, but not really in a position to share any draft language today with you. And then certainly happy to answer any other questions you may have.
Good.
Thank you so much. Let's see. Any public would like to speak on this item? Jess?
Pause for Zoom. No. I have no request to speak on item four.
Yes,
by sure. Go ahead.
Thank you. Thank you very much for this report. Appreciate the update. I do have some questions, and I beg for your, your indulgence, Chair. We were able to do some outreach to some folks in our district, and so I'll just go by the subsections, and thank you for organizing it in a very organized way. Appreciate that. My pleasure. The first one is in dispatch and communications equipment. There is a question about the AVLs and integration with Marvelous. My understanding is that our partners, regional partners, are moving away from the system and towards the tablet command system. Is there a way to bridge the existing systems to work together, or would we be able to move
to a more regionally effective system for all EMS providers?
That's
a good question. Certainly integration is our goal as we move forward with system design.
There's
been quite a lot of work and sort of proven reliability with Marvelous today,
but
happy to explore other options to continue the integration. So I think that's a good question with both the providers and our stakeholders.
Great.
So you'll just have that ongoing conversation and come up with what would be the best system to work regionally on.
Great.
In regards to the, in the expanding access to healthcare and education section, there's mention of expanding access to nontraditional EMS services in a social service bridge program. Can you expand upon what that? Is, and what you're looking for in the RFP?
Yeah,
absolutely. Thank you for that question. So the intent really, I think social services, we may be using that word a little loosely in the context of the county structure. So certainly not looking to replace a plant on social services as an entity of that engagement,
but
there are a lot of 911 calls or increasing volume of 911 calls that are low acuity and where folks don't know who else to call, so they call 911. And they may be for things that may be a connection to social service entities or social service networks. So the goal is really. Really to look at expanding and leaning into that proliferation of calls that are low acuity and making a connection point so that person may not need an ambulance transport or an ED visit but they may need pharmacy refills or access to food or whatever they may be. So it's just bridging that gap there.
Okay. So then what would you do if you had a call like that and you don't have to send transport, so you would divert them to nurse navigator or some of the other? Something
similar. In today's world. So the emergency environment supervisor, really when you call 911, it's the response of an engine or an ambulance and their only option really is to take you to the hospital, so it's trying to find ways to expand those options to reduce the burden on the emergency departments while also expanding their access to other non -traditional healthcare.
Okay. Great. In the innovations and enhancements section, you call out programs that address defining the needs of specific patient populations in a local community.
How would you address defined needs that are not supported by a published needs assessment? I know we have like the Latino assessment, the AAPI one, but the other groups of populations I'm thinking about is like geriatrics or youth or LGBTQ.
Certainly, supervisor. Thank you for that. I think certainly obviously we lean on the established reports. It's a wealth of knowledge for us to lean on. As those are non -established reports, there's certainly a, a number of metrics that both public health and our health and hospital systems do to gain information about those populations as well as direct outreach, reaching out to you and city leaders to figure out where are their gaps that they see with their communities and trying to find opportunities to bridge those. Great.
The integration of first response providers section talks about the agreements between the primary ambulance provider and each fire department. Okay. And in speaking with some of our community partners, there's a request to change that to make it into contracts with county EMS and that's so that we can preserve the ability to place resources and service if a response time by the contractor exceeds our targets in certain areas. So could we look at that change?
I
think what we're trying to do is we're envisioning there is basically a three -party agreement that includes the provider, the county and the local jurisdiction. One of the things that we've heard over the years on the part of the cities is a desire for compensation from the provider. That really has to be an agreement between the provider and the jurisdiction. And so that's a piece, that's a pretty significant piece here of what we're hoping to shift towards so that the provider is then, essentially, treating those jurisdictions in a more similar manner to the way that they currently treat the other ambulance providers that they surge into the system. But that has to be a contract
really between the provider and the local jurisdiction.
Can
we, as the one that grants the contract to the provider, make that a requirement? That they reach agreement with the?
Yeah, I mean, we can, that's why I said it would be a three -party arrangement because we would need to be involved and consent and be a piece of that. But that, you know, we don't want to be an intermediary in the financial transaction, right? So the, one of the facets of the current structure that I think has been somewhat challenging is, currently, the county, through the EMS Trust Fund, is a bit of an intermediary, fiscally, between the provider and the jurisdictions for certain of these items.
And we would like it to be a direct financial relationship.
Okay. Okay. And then, along those lines, I guess, I'm trying to envision how this would work and, you know, now that some of this is, you know, we're in the middle of, you know, cities have their own ambulances, in terms of, like, response time, how do we make sure that, right, the closest ambulance or the ambulance from that community where the call is coming from is the one, if it's available, the one that goes out? It seems like Marvelous or whatever system we use helps in that regard, but just, yeah, how do we make
sure that? I think we do. I do think it's critical that all the resources be visible to and centrally dispatched, which is a core facet, not only of what's described here, but actually prior actions the board has taken as a core piece of whatever the next RFP looks like.
Okay. Okay. Great. That's it for now. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you.
And, yeah, no, I actually do not have further, I'm certainly looking forward to the next, you know, next stage, so this is still very preliminary at this point, but certainly looking forward to the next stage when it comes back so we can have a much deeper dive onto the design, but thank you so much for the update for now. Yeah. And looking forward to see it.
Our pleasure. Thank you so much, and we'll continue to engage with all of our stakeholders as we go through this process and get their input as well. Great. So Vice Chair,
may I get a motion to accept the report?
Yes. I'm happy to make a motion to accept the report.
And I'll second that. Let's take a vote.
Vice Chairperson Abacoga?
Aye. Chairperson Lee? Aye as
well. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Moving
to item five, which is receiving a report from the Santa Clara Valley Healthcare Integrative Medicine, and we have our CEO of our SCVH, Paul Rents.
Thank you, Chair Lee, Supervisor Abacoga. Joining us today is Super, excuse me, our CMO, Fong Nguyen, and Dr. Jenny Biller, who's leading this program.
Good
afternoon, Supervisor and the Board. Absolutely. You have our written report. And we are happy to answer any questions. Good.
Let me see if there's any public who would like to speak on this item.
I am pausing for a moment. This is item five, Integrative Medicine. Right now I have two requests.
Let's do two minutes each.
Okay. Our first speaker is in chambers, Mike Rogers.
Please approach the podium.
Good afternoon.
Can you hear me okay? Yes. I'd like to thank the county leadership for really, you know, embracing this and moving forward especially the supervisors are being driving forces I'm the chair of the Health Advisory Commission we've been investigating this and helping continue to work with these guys we brought in Eric Chen I've had several discussions with Eric directly we brought in dr. Chris Magrida recently which was phenomenal long meeting with the task force directly about his model in North Carolina successful both of these are large successful Medicaid programs for large safety net populations kind of here's my advisory positions I'd like to see the next expansion to be a broad based syndromes like for example
metabolic syndrome we've got women's health we've got pediatrics doing more integration and stuff hey these are the types of things that are safety net population diverse ethnicities more than 90 % of people in the county that was supported by the system suffer from these conditions secondly grant grants are really important for systems like this to get off the ground Chris Magrida dr. Chen their first help was having a little bit of breathing room to be able to work on organizational boundaries right in fact dr. Chen said hey I had a supervisor basically tell the Alameda Foundation give them a grant to get food for medicine off the ground now it's the it's a stellar program
for the whole state right and we're continuing to look at how do we they're even offering us potential services etc the other thing is it's challenging because there's silos in SCVH right we have to figure out what Chris Magrida works great across his organizational boundaries they're tuned across disciplines right and they support even when they don't have the funding somebody doesn't have coverage they have the ability to say the right thing to do is treat this patient same with dr. Chen because he has some flexibility because of the grants right and then finally I'd like to see a roadmap for how the expansion rolls out how to supervisor Abacogas request how do these services become
generally available thank you thank
you our
next speaker is Ken Horowitz on zoom we'll open your microphone you'll
have two minutes the timer will start when you begin speaking
yes
yeah doctor
would you mind try to readjusting the mic it's very um garbled you're going to start over again yeah thank you
okay i'll try it i'm i'm not i'm that possible make it clear um we talked to a proposal of four years ago
it's time to put the boots on the ground
the cost of care is going up and up and up and we'll never reach the point where we can finance after so let's try things differently than we do i hope you put uh forward a recommendation because the climate will be forward so that integrative medicine can become a culture i think the strategies that are being proposed are good but they'll only work if they're actually worked um don't do enough actually so let's put the boots on the ground now let's get it started thank you for your time
just a note from the clerk that mr horace did also submit written post comments that you can refer
to very good thank you okay
let's close the public speaking part on this one yes i share you have any questions on this one thank
you uh chair and thank you for continuing this conversation i know chair and i are very interested in integrative medicine i think you've heard us over and over say that so i appreciate that we're continuing to pursue this as mentioned by our health advisory commissioner um i too am interested in uh maybe a more detailed concrete road back on how to um move the i am forward um so i uh would ask like what are some concrete steps that we can take in the next year to increase the adoption of im practices within our provider with it beyond the provider education that we're doing so
um we i have been meeting with uh people other physicians from different departments as you know integrated medicine it's about collaboration between specialties and um so very we're very fortunate to have a life healthy lifestyle program in pediatrics department and so we're going to the adult medicine side is trying to collaborate with the pediatric side to create a similar program we have written up a proposal for healthy lifestyle and metabolic syndrome management program you know of course the proposal is done but we still need to work out the details about how to go about implementing this program which will be similar to the medical bariatrics program but it's very different in that we'll um we'll
put everybody from you know we'll have nutritionists social worker and hopefully psychologists all work together to really focus carrying the patients who have very complex metabolic syndrome like complex diabetes poorly controlled high blood pressure kidney disease and those are the you know
it's not going to be easy and fast i'm not going to be able to promise you oh by the end of this year you're going to see this outcome but i can tell you we are actively working together with various departments including the office of sustainability and resilience i understand they're working on a food management system yes and uh we've been working on that as well so we'll working with her and Dr. Steven Chen from Alameda County to set up our own medicine, a food as medicine program. And as you know, that's gonna take a few years again. But you know, it's just great because we have a lot of people in our hospital system,
health care system, who have different areas of expertise. And I think right now we're starting slow because we're still exploring, you know, what's possible without spending a whole bunch of money to hire new people.
You know, kind of, we're
trying to build bridges between different departments so that we can all collaborate and work together.
So sorry,
I don't have a really good, like, concrete roadmap, but I do have a five -year plan that is forever changing every few weeks.
It's
a different five -year plan. But I can, I'm happy to send it to you.
It's
completely a draft.
It's
not, you know, it's not ready for prime time.
Yeah,
that would be really helpful.
Just,
and I very much understand it's iterative.
So,
but to have that,
and
even, you know, if you can share that in our updates, so at some frequent frequency, that would be helpful just to see it evolving and moving forward. So I would, my other question was that what are the primary operational and cultural barriers that are preventing the broader integration of IM?
The
barriers we have in our healthcare system are very similar to all conventional healthcare system. We are very, we treat patients as diseases,
so
if you have a kidney disease you go to the kidney doctor
if
you have eye disease you go to the eye doctor
although
we have a primary care physician but the primary care physicians usually just send people off
you
we did a referral
and
they you don't really communicate with the other doctors
so
I think there's a the biggest barrier is really our American medical system with our culture is such that we because we are fee -for -service
you
provide a particular service you get pay so the
it's
not our systems that set up as though we can collaborate easily
we
have different call centers
like
the nutritionist who was who are working with the bariatric clinic
they're
under nutrition department
they're
not part of the
bariatrics
program you know it's just even the call center you
know
all those things
I
don't think we can solve that problem quickly but I think we can definitely reimagine a different way of delivery our health care
I
really think we have a lot we're very fortunate in our County we have a lot of resources
not
just money but also people
right
and I I think that's the problem is people don't
we
don't know what the other person is doing
you
have very happy that I'm working with the public health health department and I'm working with the office of sustainability and resilience you really learn what they're doing
how
what they do you can help the health care system as a whole
but
that's going to take time
sure
yes
I
know there it's easy to be in silos
and
this is really about breaking down those silos
and
I do understand it'll take time but we just have to keep working together it's important to do that we can't take time we have to be flexible at it right so so i know that one of the challenges um is reimbursement
um but
i also i keep i do hear about alameda and that they've been successful in this and are there some best practices or lessons learned that learned that we can gain from alameda is doing
um
the the main thing with the alameda program is the food is medicine program
okay
dr um chan was able to pull all the small farmers together and create a workflow to implement so that we can actually deliver medically tailored
medically
prescribed meals to patients
yeah
so that's what we are trying to do for some of our most vulnerable patients
and
the reason we're trying to do that it's because you know food insecurity is a big problem right now right so we're trying to
instead
of just telling patients you have to eat healthy you know you're trying to create a system where we can actually provide healthy food and so that's the main part of alameda county where we're folk um we're kind of learning from
okay and
uh the best practices honestly
um
we're still doing visit like fee for service
we are
fqhc sites
so
each time the patient come we bill based on their medical problems okay you know based on their visit
but
um i think what we are trying to understand is the alternative things like acupuncture chiropractor and how will dose be reimbursed and um as of right now
i
we actually i actually found out a couple of our primary care physicians just got their acupuncturist license okay so it's it's what one of those things once again if we didn't ask we didn't know right
so
now i'm like oh okay we have people like that then we can probably start exploring different um reimbursement models
and
um we do need to talk to the health plan about the budget they have for food is medicine
uh
-huh
yeah yeah okay well
great
thank
you so much appreciate it
thank
you chair
good
paul
thank
you uh supervisor lee
supervisor
abe koga i think to your request about a further defined roadmap
that's
something that we can work with dr biller and dr nguyen on and bring back in future reports
that'd
be great i appreciate that i i like to have timelines and you know goals and just see where we're headed
um and
so having something like that to to just check in on would be really helpful
thank
you
thank
you
well
on on that note regarding you mentioned acupuncture and chiropractic services uh california's one of the few states that recognize
you
know acupuncture
and
i would love to learn more about the reimbursement side of it on the revenue since we are so tight on with the money side and how we could enhance that
reimbursement
because we know it works
uh it's
a something that um like you said
they don't
necessarily teach that in medical school but that doesn't mean it's not something that's useful
and
in this case that's what integrative medicine is
a
lot of these things they don't teach you in medical school turns out to be something that's very uh you know
i
always tell people you know what's that clinical studies do you have acupuncture
well
we only have 5 000 years of it so i think i think it was proven
so
for that matter i i really think we we need to uh uh encourage
more
uh usage of it and and not make it look like a kind of a cult like weird studies and oh my god all these needles
like
there's a lot of people are not exposed to it would have that initial feelings
uh but
you know we've of course
seen
many uh very beneficial uh uh practices and as we all know a lot of our
drug addiction problem we have
it's
on what i call irresponsible pain management you know you know providing people with these very highly addictive uh painkillers for the past decades and these are so -called you know proven medical practices and acceptable fda approved medications and and now we have a huge uh a bunch of addictive problems we're dealing with so i think these type of alternative ways to deal with pain that does not lead to these type of addiction is truly uh necessary so i just want to mention why i think it's so important that we adopt these practices sooner and you know a lot of times you know i understand people you know have medical degrees or practice for a long
time
uh
but understanding some of these alternative practices is is truly important and so i just want to uh thank you for for coming here and uh discussing what you're working on yeah looking forward to the the world the roadmap that you have ahead
uh
and certainly want to make sure that if you can reimburse for any or all of it
that
would be uh amazing
yeah
okay
thank you so much for the report
truly
excited
we're
moving forward and looking forward to future reports to work on the now incorporated fully uh uh throughout the hospital system uh in the future
all
right
do
i have a motion to receive report please
yes thank you vice
chairperson abacoga
aye chairperson
lee
aye
as well
thank
you
thank
you
all right moving
on to item seven which is receiving a report relating to efforts to establish a mobile medical unit on the anza college campus
thank
you chair lee
i'm very
pleased to to share with this committee and of course the community that we will be launching the mobile medical unit at the anza college campus on may 6 and it will be there every wednesday
and
we will continue to monitor the utilization and adjust our schedule as needed to serve that community
so
with that being said i'm very pleased to to share that and happy to be here thank you to take any questions
from
from this committee
and
also uh celine ho our primary care director is also with us who has been wonderful in bringing us about
great all
right
do
if any public likes to speak on the sim
I have
no request to speak on item seven
yes
vice chair
any
questions
thank you chair um just really a big thank you to paul and celine and your entire team for making this happen and that is the intent of this meeting and we are very thankful to the committee for this BEING JUST OVER A YEAR INTO THIS ROLE, YOU KNOW, GOVERNMENT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK SLOWLY.
THIS
IS QUITE AN ACCOMPLISHMENT
AND
I REALLY APPRECIATE THE HARD WORK THAT YOU PUT INTO MAKING THIS HAPPEN.
I
KNOW THE COMMUNITY HAS BEEN ASKING WHEN IS THIS GOING TO OPEN
SO
NOW WE CAN TELL THEM WHEN IT'S OPENING. I REALLY APPRECIATE THE COUNTY WORKING WITH DE ANZA COLLEGE IN THAT PARTNERSHIP I THINK IS VERY VALUABLE.
SO
JUST A QUESTION IN TERMS OF WHAT
SERVICES
YOU EXPECT TO HAVE AVAILABLE IN THEM.
WON'T YOU COME UP AND RESPOND?
ALTHOUGH
I CAN, I THINK GIVEN ALL THE WORK YOU 'VE PUT IN.
GOOD
AFTERNOON, SUPERVISOR. YES, WE'RE PROVIDING PRIMARY CARE SERVICES AND SO ROUTINE CHECKUPS, SICK VISITS, VACCINATIONS,
LAB
TESTING, AND THEN OBVIOUSLY REFERRAL TO A MEDICAL HOME WITHIN OUR PRIMARY CARE NETWORK IF THEY DON'T ARGUE WITH THAT. SO WE ALREADY HAVE ONE.
THANK YOU.
AND
THEN IN TERMS OF
PROMOTING
THE MMU, WHAT ARE SOME OF OUR PLANS TO PR AND MAYBE THAT WAS ITEM SIX THAT WE PUT ON THE SUBMIT. HOW ARE WE GOING TO PROMOTE USAGE?
SO NOW THAT WE HAVE A LAUNCH DATE, WE 'VE BEEN WORKING WITH OUR MARKETING DEPARTMENT TO CREATE SOME OUTREACH MATERIALS. OUR TEAM IS GOING TO BE ON SITE AT DE ANZA COLLEGE. WE'RE GOING TO DO SOME OUTREACH MATERIALS AS WELL TO LET THE FOLKS KNOW WHERE OUR MMU IS GOING TO BE PARKED AND THE HOURS.
OF
COURSE, IT'S ALSO FOR OUR SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AS WELL. SO WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO DO SOME GRASSROOTS OUTREACH, POSTING IN SOCIAL MEDIA,
ALSO
PROVIDING IT AT COMMUNITY CENTERS IN AND AROUND THE AREA AS WELL.
GREAT. THANK YOU. AND WE'RE HAPPY OUR OFFICE TO HELP PUSH IT OUT TOO THROUGH OUR CHANNELS.
I
KNOW THERE'S A GRAND OPENING LAND. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU AGAIN. REALLY APPRECIATE ALL OF THE WORK. THANK YOU, CHAIR.
HEY,
THANK YOU. SO THIS PILOT PROGRAM IS SCHEDULED TO LAST ONE YEAR. AND THE MMU WILL BE OPEN ONCE A WEEK ON WEDNESDAY. SO IS THAT THE EXPECTED LENGTH OF PILOTS ONE YEAR?
YEAH, WE'RE STARTING OUT WITH ONE DAY A WEEK. WE WANT TO SEE WHAT THE VOLUME LOOKS LIKE AND WHAT THE SERVICE NEEDS ARE. AND WE 'LL SEE IF WE NEED TO ADJUST. ONCE WE LAUNCH AND SEE.
WELL, EXACTLY. SO IF IT TURNS OUT THAT SERVICE SEEMS TO BE VERY POPULAR, IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO INCREASE IT TO TWICE A WEEK. LET'S SAY IF WE STARTED WEDNESDAY, MAYBE WEDNESDAY AND FRIDAYS, TWICE A WEEK IN ORDER TO MEET SOME OF THESE. BECAUSE I KNOW FOR STUDENTS, IF I RECALL THE DAYS OF STUDENTS, FRIDAY TENDS TO BE THE DAY OF THE LEAST CLASSES, FOR EXAMPLE, RIGHT? SO THAT MIGHT BE EASIER FOR STUDENTS TO ACCESS THIS SERVICE. SO IS THIS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE DONE, LET'S SAY, AFTER THREE MONTHS IF IT TURNS OUT TO BE SO POPULAR?
YES.
WE WILL DEFINITELY TAKE A LOOK AT THE SCHEDULES
AND
SEE IF WE NEED TO ADJUST.
OKAY. GOOD. YEAH. WHEN DO YOU THINK YOU 'LL COME BACK TO GIVE US A QUICK OVERVIEW OF HOW THINGS ARE GOING AFTER IT STARTED? ABOUT A QUARTER LATER OR SIX MONTHS? YEAH.
WE CAN PROBABLY DO A QUARTERLY UPDATE WITH INITIAL LAUNCH AND SEE IF THERE'S ANY ADJUSTMENTS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE.
OKAY. SO YOU'RE STARTING AROUND APRIL TIME FRAME, Q2, RIGHT? RIGHT. SO MAYBE AROUND JUNE OR JULY. WELL, JULY IS OUR BREAK. STARTING IN JULY I THINK WOULD WORK.
YEAH. JULY THERE'S NO BOARD MEETING, RIGHT? RIGHT. SO AUGUST.
AUGUST. SO MAYBE THE UPDATE COULD BE AUGUST TIME FRAME. IF YOU COME BACK TO US THE NEXT RECESSION MEETING THAT WOULD BE GREAT. YEAH. PERFECT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE. ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE. MAY I HAVE A MOTION?
YES. I 'LL GIVE THE REPORT. YES.
SO THE REPORT AS WELL. I'M NOT GOING TO ADD A MOTION BUT LOOKING FORWARD TO THE PILOT, THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS BY AUGUST. THANK YOU SO MUCH. LET'S TAKE A VOTE.
VICE CHAIRPERSON ABBACOGA? AYE. CHAIRPERSON
LEE? AYE AS WELL.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
MOVING TO ITEM EIGHT, WHICH
IS OUR, LET'S SEE, YEP,
SO THE REPORT OUT FROM OUR COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM. I THINK, PAUL, YOU WERE FIRST ON THIS ONE. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD? JUST A
FEW ITEMS. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE OUR WRITTEN REPORT, BUT I DID WANT TO POINT OUT A FEW THINGS. FIRST, AS YOU WELL KNOW, THAT OUR SOUTH COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER BROKE GROUND OR STARTED CONSTRUCTION. SO WE'RE VERY PLEASED WITH THAT. AND AS YOU KNOW, IT'S MODELED AFTER THE CAC IN SAN JOSE, WHICH HAS BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL. AND IT WILL DELIVER TRAUMA INFORMED MEDICAL EVALUATION, FORENSIC INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES, AND FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES TO THESE IN ONE LOCATION FOR OUR SOUTH COUNTY RESIDENTS. AND OBVIOUSLY THIS HAS COME ABOUT BECAUSE OF A VERY DEEP PARTNERSHIP WITH THE D .A.'S OFFICE AND MULTIPLE OTHER COMMUNITY -BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN OUR COMMUNITY. SO WE'RE VERY PLEASED THAT THAT PROJECT IS MOVING FORWARD.
I THINK THIS IS ALSO AN IMPORTANT NOTE THAT IS INCLUDED IN THE REPORT. THE BREAST CENTER AT VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER HAS EXPANDED OUR CAPACITY. WE 'VE SEEN A 51 % INCREASE IN OUR VISIT VOLUME IN OUR HEALTH SYSTEM SINCE WE 'VE ADDED THE SECOND SURGEON.
THIS
ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR OUR SYSTEM TO REDIRECT TO OUTSIDE PROVIDERS. THE BREAST CENTER IS NATIONALLY ACCREDITED BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS,
THE
NATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR BREAST CENTERS. AND RIGHT NOW WE TREAT OVER 200 WOMEN
WITH
BREAST CANCER.
THAT'S
A LOT IN OUR SYSTEM IN TERMS OF THEIR ONGOING TREATMENT.
YOUR HEALTH SYSTEM HAS SEEN STRONG OPERATIONAL
DEMAND
ACROSS THE HEALTH SYSTEM AT ALL OF OUR HOSPITALS
IN
THE AREAS OF EMERGENCY CARE, IMPATIENT AND SPECIALTY CARE. THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS ARE UP APPROXIMATELY
15
% SINCE JULY OF
2025.
AND IMPATIENT UTILIZATION HAS INCREASED ABOUT 7%.
OBVIOUSLY
THIS REFLUXED THE SUSTAINED COMMUNITY RELIANCE ON YOUR AND GROWING RELIANCE ON YOUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
I
ALSO WANTED TO SHARE THAT SANTA
CLARA
VALLEY HEALTH CARE IS ON TRACK TO RECEIVE 100 % OF OUR QUALITY INCENTIVE PROGRAM OR QUIP FUNDING. THIS IS THE SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING THAT WE RECEIVE FROM MEDICAID. THAT REPRESENTS ABOUT $170 MILLION ANNUALLY. SO THIS REALLY REFLECTS OUR ABILITY TO NOT ONLY MEET QUALITY METRICS. AND TO ACHIEVE THE REVENUE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT. THE SYSTEM RANKS IN THE TOP DECILE NATIONALLY ON MOST MEDICAL QUALITY
MEASURES.
SO WE'RE VERY PLEASED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF OUR CLINICAL STAFF AND OUR
STAFF
WITHIN THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOR THAT
INCREDIBLE PROGRESS RELATIVE TO THOSE ACHIEVEMENTS. YOU SHOULD ALSO KNOW AND THIS IS ONE OF OUR BUDGET INITIATIVES THAT WE HAD PRESENTED AT MID YEAR,
SANTA
CLARA VALLEY HEALTH CARE HAS EARNED THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
CERTIFICATION FOR
DIABETES SELF -MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND SUPPORT. WHICH ACTUALLY ALLOWS
OUR PHARMACIST
LED DIABETES EDUCATION
PROGRAM
WHEN THEY CONDUCT VISITS TO BECOME BILLABLE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OUR SYSTEM. SO JUST HAVING THAT ACCREDITATION AND CERTIFICATION ALLOWS US TO BILL. AND SO BETWEEN NOVEMBER OF 2020 AND JANUARY OF 2026, JUST FOR THAT SHORT PERIOD OF
TIME, YOUR
FOUR ACCREDITED VALLEY HEALTH CENTER SITES HAVE GENERATED ABOUT $750 ,000 IN ADDITIONAL REVENUE, NEW REVENUE FOR THE HEALTH SYSTEM.
THAT'S
FOR A THREE MONTH PERIOD OF TIME.
SO
THAT GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF SOME OF THE INITIATIVES THAT WE'RE IMPLEMENTING TO ENSURE THAT WE MAXIMIZE THE REVENUE FOR OUR HEALTH SYSTEM AND THE COUNTY.
IS
THIS ONGOING?
YES. SO $750 ,000 AND TIMES FOUR, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT $3 MILLION A YEAR.
YES, AND THAT WAS OUR PROPOSAL THAT WE PROVIDED TO YOU. SO THAT GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF HOW WE'RE GOING ABOUT TRYING TO
ENSURE THE CONTINUED DELIVERY OF SERVICE, BUT ALSO GENERATE THE REVENUE TO MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM.
SO
I THOUGHT THAT WAS REALLY IMPORTANT TO SHARE WITH YOU BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS OF INITIATIVES THAT WE PUT FORWARD.
AND THE LAST THING I DID WANT TO SHARE, AND I THINK BOTH OF YOU ARE AWARE, BUT O 'CONNOR HOSPITAL WAS ALSO RECOGNIZED AS AN AGE -FRIENDLY HEALTH SYSTEM HOSPITAL FOR IMPLEMENTING THE 4Ms FRAMEWORK, WHICH IS WHAT MATTERS, MEDICATIONS, MENTATION AND MOBILITY, AND THIS IS THE FRAMEWORK THAT IS AN EVIDENCE -BASED APPROACH THAT PROMOTES SAFE, COORDINATED AND PERSON -CENTERED CARE FOR OUR OLDER ADULT POPULATION. AND SO WHILE IT'S STARTING AT O 'CONNOR HOSPITAL, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE MOVING TOWARDS FROM A SYSTEM -WIDE PERSPECTIVE TO BETTER SERVE OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR AGING POPULATION. WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. BUT AGAIN, THANK YOU. NO,
THANK YOU, PAUL. THOSE ARE SO MANY GREAT UPDATE AND SO MANY AWARD -WINNING ISSUES. AND AS ALVEY SAID, IS THAT IF WE DON'T TOOT OUR OWN HORN, THE CRITICS WILL SAY IT FOR US. AND GIVE PEOPLE THE FALSE SENSE OF PROBLEMS OF OUR HEALTH CARE THAT WE'RE PROVIDING. SO WHAT CAN WE DO TO PROMOTE THIS, THESE GOOD NEWS? BOTH IN THE, YOU KNOW, SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE PUBLICITY -WISE. AND TWO IS, CAN WE HANG THESE THINGS ON OUR WALLS WHEN THE PATIENT VISITS US AT V .M .C. OR OTHER CLINICS?
SUPERVISOR, SO WE DO HAVE OUR COMMUNITY MARKETING COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP AND WE DO
PROMOTE THESE ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH OUR SOCIAL MEDIA AND OUR WEBSITE. AND WE DO SHARE THIS AS WE COMMUNICATE WITH OUR COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND OUR PARTNERS SO THAT THEY'RE SHARING IN THIS GOOD NEWS AND SUCCESS AS WE MOVE FORWARD. BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO TO FURTHER PROMOTE AND ENSURE THAT THESE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DO NOT GO UNNOTICED.
YEAH,
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO DO THAT. AND EVEN IN OUR LIKE, YOU KNOW, EMAIL SENDING CHURCH, BESIDES SAYING WHO WE ARE, JUST PUT DOWN THE AWARDS THAT WE'RE WINNING AND STICK THOSE LABELS. I MEAN, EVERY LITTLE THING HELPS, RIGHT? TO HELP PROMOTE THESE GOOD NEWS THAT WE ARE RECEIVING THESE GREAT AWARDS. I THINK IT'S UPON US TO TELL THE STORY. AND SO, YEAH, PLEASE CONTINUE DOING THAT AND ANYTHING WE CAN DO AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS TO SAY THOSE THINGS AND ALL THE VARIOUS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WE HAVE, WE ARE SO HAPPY TO INCORPORATE IN OUR SPEECHES. YEAH. OKAY. WE 'LL DO THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. YES, DR. REDMAN. GO AHEAD.
I'M GOING TO JUMP IN ON THE NEXT ITEM. SURE, PLEASE. ABSOLUTELY. ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THE HEALTH OFFICER REPORT, I HAVE TWO TOPICS JUST TO COVER VERY BRIEFLY. THE FIRST IS JUST THAT SINCE THIS BODY LEST MET, WE DID HAVE THE COUNTY'S FIRST MEASLES CASE OF THE YEAR, AND NORMALLY WE DON'T TALK ABOUT FIRST OF THE YEAR BECAUSE IT IS SUCH AN UNUSUAL EVENT, BUT THIS YEAR I WILL NOT BE SURPRISED IF IT'S NOT OUR LAST. FORTUNATELY, BECAUSE OF THE STRUCTURES WE HAVE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND FRANKLY BECAUSE OF THE VERY HIGH IMMUNITY RATES DUE TO VACCINATION AND DISTANT INFECTION FOR OLDER ADULTS, WE WERE ABLE TO QUICKLY GET
OUR ARMS AROUND THIS CASE, REACH OUT TO MANY, MANY, MANY EXPOSED PERSONS, MAKE SURE THAT WE KNEW THAT THEY WERE IN HIGH RISK LOCATIONS LIKE HOSPITALS AND SCHOOLS UNTIL WE KNEW THEY WERE UNLIKELY TO GET SICK, AND TO KEEP THIS DISEASE FROM SPREADING. SO HUGE SORT OF NOTE OF GRATITUDE TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH STAFF WHO HELPED WITH THAT RESPONSE AS WELL AS OUR COLLABORATORS IN SAN MATEO COUNTY WHERE THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL EXPOSURE. AND THEN THE SECOND JUST HAS TO DO WITH VACCINE NEWS IN GENERAL. THE FIRST IS TO MAKE FOLKS AWARE THAT WE ARE EXPERIENCING AN UNUSUALLY LATE YEAR FOR OUR VIRUS, RSV, RESPIRATORY SYNCESTIAL VIRUS. THIS IS A VIRUS THAT SPREADS EVERY WINTER
BUT USUALLY PEAKS IN JANUARY AND CAN BE ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR OLDER ADULTS BUT ALSO FOR INFANTS, ESPECIALLY NEWBORNS. AND WE KNOW THAT IT IS ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE CAUSES OF HOSPITALIZATION FOR INFANTS INCLUDING HERE IN SANTA CLARE COUNTY, BUT FORTUNATELY TWO YEARS AGO WE DEVELOPED OR GOT ACCESS TO A NEW SHOT THAT HELPS KEEP BABIES FROM BEING SERIOUSLY VULNERABLE. SO BECAUSE OF THE LATE SEASON THIS YEAR, NORMALLY WE SAY A BABY BORN AFTER MARCH OR IF YOUR BABY WAS BORN THIS WINTER BUT HASN'T GOTTEN THAT SHOT, YOU'RE GOOD FOR THE YEAR, WE 'LL WORRY ABOUT IT NEXT YEAR IF YOU'RE PARTICULARLY MEDICALLY VULNERABLE. BUT THIS YEAR CALIFORNIA HAS SAID BABIES BORN ALL THE WAY
THROUGH THE END OF APRIL OR BABIES BORN THIS WINTER WHO HAVEN'T GOTTEN THEIR SHOT YET SHOULD STILL GET WHAT'S CALLED A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY SHOT, A SHOT THAT HELPS KEEP BABIES OUT OF THE HOSPITAL FROM RSV. SO WE'RE WORKING HARD TO GET THAT MESSAGE OUT TO PEDIATRICIANS, OBSTETRICS PROVIDERS, FOLKS EXPECTING TO DELIVER IN THE NEXT SIX WEEKS SO THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING THIS ADDITIONAL LAYER OF PROTECTION THIS WINTER BUT LATER INTO THE SPRING OR WHAT FEELS LIKE SUMMER RIGHT
NOW.
AND THEN FINALLY I 'LL JUST SAY THAT I'M SORT OF WATCHING CLOSELY AND APPRECIATING THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE LAWSUIT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
ACIP, THE BODY, THE CDC AND HHS MORE GENERALLY AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL DURING WHICH THIS WEEK A JUDGE FOUND THAT THE PROCESS THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT USED TO MAKE DRASTIC CHANGES TO WHICH VACCINES ARE AVAILABLE ACROSS THE COUNTRY
DID
NOT FOLLOW A SCIENTIFIC OR LEGALLY RIGOROUS AND APPROPRIATE PROCESS. SO I 'LL LEAVE THE LEGAL COMPONENTS TO THE TRUE EXPERTS IN THE ROOM. I WILL SAY FROM A SCIENTIFIC, MEDICAL, PUBLIC HEALTH STATUS I THINK THIS IS A WIN FOR THE PEOPLE OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY EVEN THOUGH CALIFORNIA HAD ALREADY TAKEN STEPS TO PROTECT OUR VACCINE ACCESS. WE WANT FOLKS HERE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO HAVE UNFETTERED ACCESS TO THE VACCINES THAT WE KNOW KEEP FOLKS HEALTHY SO WE CAN GET OUR KIDS BACK TO SCHOOL, BACK TO SOCCER PRACTICE, BACK TO ENJOYING THIS WEATHER AND OUT OF THE HOSPITAL.
AND
I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. YES,
THANK YOU.
LET'S SEE. YES. IF
YOU HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS, I HAVE A COMPLETELY SEPARATE QUESTION TOPIC. OKAY.
SURE. LET ME START WITH THIS ONE. GOING BACK TO THE ISSUE OF MEASLES, MOST OF US ALREADY HAVE OUR MEASLES, ACTUALLY OUR COMBO SHORT, MR, MUM'S MEASLES AND RABELLA, RIGHT?
THAT'S RIGHT. AND
BUT OF COURSE MANY OF US ALSO GOT THEM A LONG TIME AGO. AND SO HOW DO WE GET MEASURED TO SEE WHETHER A BOOSTER WOULD BE NEEDED AND HOW DO PEOPLE GET THE BOOSTER? SURE.
SO THERE IS A BLOOD TEST THAT CAN HELP FIGURE OUT IF YOUR BODY SHOWS IMMUNITY TO MEASLES, WHETHER YOU'RE IN THAT VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE AFTER A SHOT OR TWO SHOTS WHO ARE IMMUNE FOR LIFE OR COULD BE IN THAT VERY SMALL SUBSET WHO DIDN'T SHOW IMMUNITY. HOWEVER, GIVEN HOW EFFECTIVE THE TWO VACCINE SHOTS ARE WHEN YOU 'VE HAD TWO SHOTS, WE DON'T RECOMMEND EVERYONE RUN OUT AND GET THAT BLOOD TEST. WE RECOMMEND IT SPECIFICALLY IF YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU 'VE EVER GOTTEN THE SHOTS OR YOU THINK YOU MAY NOT HAVE OR WE RECOMMEND IT FOR CERTAIN FOLKS WHO HAVE SERIOUS MEDICAL ILLNESSES THAT MAY HAVE IMPACTED THEIR IMMUNITY OR FOR FOLKS WHO MAY
HAVE GROWN UP AT A TIME WHEN THEY WERE NEVER VACCINATED AND DON'T KNOW WHETHER THEY EVER HAD MEASLES. SO IT'S REALLY A SMALL SUBSET OF THE POPULATION WE RECOMMEND GET THAT BLOOD TEST RIGHT NOW. NOW, THAT CHANGES IF WE FIND OUT YOU 'VE BEEN EXPOSED AND WE DON'T HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR SHOT. WE OFTEN VERY RAPIDLY STAND UP AT PUBLIC HEALTH RESOURCES TO GET BLOOD TESTS SO THAT WE CAN BE SURE WHO'S AT HIGHEST RISK OF GETTING SICK AND KEEP FOLKS SAFE WHEN THAT HAPPENS. BUT IN GENERAL, THE MORE IMPORTANT STEP FOR EVERYONE TO TAKE RIGHT NOW IS TO CHECK YOUR VACCINATION RECORDS. IF YOU 'VE GOT A RECORD THAT YOU HAD TWO SHOTS,
ESPECIALLY BECAUSE WE HAVE SUCH A VIBRANT IMMIGRANT POPULATION HERE, A LOT OF THE TIMES THAT WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR IMMIGRATION AND SO FOLKS HAVE FAIRLY RECENT RECORDS. IF YOU 'VE GOT THAT RECORD, I'D
LIKE TO TALK TO YOUR DOCTOR ABOUT WHETHER THE BLOOD TEST MAKES SENSE FOR YOU. THE LAST THING I WILL ADD, IF I MAY, IS THAT RIGHT NOW, ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY AND OTHER PLACES THAT HISTORICALLY HAVE VERY LOW RATES OF MEASLES, WE DON'T RECOMMEND YOUR FIRST MEASLE SHOT UNTIL YOU'RE A YEAR OLD. BUT THE EXCEPTION TO THAT RULE IS IF YOU'RE TRAVELING SOMEWHERE WHERE THERE'S AN OUTBREAK.
WE
USED TO SAY THAT WAS MOSTLY IN OTHER COUNTRIES, BUT NOW IT INCLUDES PLACES IN THE U .S.
BUT
IF YOU'RE TRAVELING SOMEWHERE, PARENTS MAY WANT TO CONSIDER VACCINATING BABIES AS YOUNG AS SIX MONTHS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT BECAUSE THE SHOT DOES START TO HELP AT THAT POINT,
YOU
CAN GIVE AN ADDED LAYER OF PROTECTION IF BABIES WILL BE TRAVELING BETWEEN THE AGE OF SIX MONTHS AND 12 MONTHS, AND WE WANT TO BE SURE THAT IN THEIR TRAVEL TO A PLACE WITH HIGHER RATES OF MEASLES, THEY HAVE THAT LAYER OF PROTECTION.
GREAT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
CAN
I ASK ABOUT THAT,
PLEASE?
GO AHEAD. THIS MIGHT BE A STUPID QUESTION, BUT I'M THINKING, GIVEN MY AGE, I'M 55, AND PROBABLY GOT THE SHOT WHEN I WAS A BABY. HOW DO THOSE RECORDS CHANCE OVER?
AND
I 'LL SAY, TOO, BECAUSE MY FAMILY DIDN'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE, ME GROWING UP, MY CARE WAS A BIT SPOTTY. SO HOW WOULD I BE ABLE
TO
CHECK THAT?
THERE
ARE SYSTEMS THAT WILL SOMETIMES HELP US LOOK INTO HISTORICAL VACCINATION RECORDS AND WE RECENTLY RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR SOMEBODY WHO GREW UP IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, I THINK AROUND 40 YEARS AGO, AND WE WERE ABLE TO DIG SOMETHING UP FOR THEM. IT REALLY VARIES, SO I DON'T WANT TO MAKE A PROMISE THAT WE 'LL BE ABLE TO FIND A PARTICULAR RECORD FOR SOMEONE WHO GREW UP IN THIS AREA IN CALIFORNIA. WHAT I WILL SAY IS THAT SYSTEMS TO DO SO HAVE IMPROVED DRASTICALLY OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS. THERE'S A SYSTEM CALLED CARE, BASICALLY THE CALIFORNIA
IMMUNIZATION
REGISTRY THAT ALLOWS US NOW, THE SECOND YOU GET YOUR VACCINE AT ONE OF OUR COUNTY HOSPITALS OR ANOTHER HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, IT AUTOMATICALLY GOES INTO A STATEWIDE SYSTEM WHERE WE CAN CHECK FOR YOU.
SO
IF YOU DID GROW UP ELSEWHERE IN CALIFORNIA, I CAN FIND THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU.
SO
IT MAY VARY
IF
YOU 'VE GOT THOSE OLD YELLOW CARDS SOMEWHERE IT'S WORTH DIGGING UP,
IT
MAY BE WORTH TALKING TO YOUR OLD DOCTOR, BUT IT MAY BE AS SIMPLE AS WE CAN FIND IT IN THE STATEWIDE SYSTEM BECAUSE WE 'VE
BEEN GOING TO COLLEGE. THERE'S CERTAIN CHECKPOINTS IN YOUR LIFE WHERE YOU HAVE TO HAVE BEEN VACCINATED TO MOVE IN THERE, SO IF YOU 'VE BEEN GOING THROUGH THAT, THEN I DON'T KNOW,
I
CAN'T REMEMBER IF THERE WAS ONE WHEN YOU'RE PREGNANT OR GETTING READY TO GET PREGNANT, BUT ARE THOSE INDICATORS THAT YOU'RE MOST LIKELY
VACCINATED? AND
ONE MORE REASON WHY IT'S SO WONDERFUL WHEN FOLKS ARE ENGAGED IN COMPREHENSIVE PRIMARY CARE BECAUSE IT DOES CREATE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES TO REGENERATE THOSE RECORDS AND CHECK UP ON IT.
SO
IN PREGNANCY, ACTUALLY, IT'S A DIFFERENT COMPONENT OF THE MMR VACCINE WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT. WE'RE MOST WORRIED ABOUT RUBELLA BECAUSE IT CAN BE HARMFUL TO A FETUS OR A PREGNANCY,
BUT
WE DO OFTEN CHECK INTO SOMEONE'S VACCINATION RECORD FOR MMR AT THE TIME OF PREGNANCY,
AND
THAT HELPS US UPDATE DOCUMENTATION WHEN WE CAN.
SO
FOLKS MAY HAVE THROUGHOUT THEIR LIVES, ESPECIALLY IF THEY HAD ACCESS TO PRIMARY CARE, MAY HAVE UPDATED RECORDS,
AND
IF NOT, TALKING TO YOUR DOCTOR ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL RISK RIGHT NOW, ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE TRAVELING, YOU'RE HAVING OTHER HEALTH CONCERNS, CAN HELP YOU FIGURE OUT WHETHER ANYTHING ELSE IS NEEDED RIGHT NOW OR WHETHER YOU FALL INTO ONE OF THE GROUPS THAT WE PRESUME IMMUNE, WHICH IS, AGAIN, THE VAST MAJORITY OF FOLKS IN THIS AREA. GREAT.
THANK
YOU.
SO MY OTHER QUESTION, TOTALLY DIFFERENT TOPIC, BUT SOMETHING YOU KEEP HEARING FROM ME IS COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER PROGRAM FOR THE AAPI COMMUNITY, I KNOW IN APRIL WE'RE SUPPOSED TO GET A COMPREHENSIVE REPORT TO THE FULL BOARD, BUT JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM THAT THAT INCLUDES BOTH THE LATINO AND THE AAPI COMMUNITY PROGRAMS, AND THEN ARE THERE OPPORTUNITIES, ARE YOU LOOKING AT MERGING THE TWO FOR ECONOMIES OF SCALE?
SURE. SO
THE REPORT THAT WILL COME BACK TO THE ENTIRE BOARD AT THE END OF APRIL DID COME OUT OF THE LATINO HEALTH ASSESSMENT, AND THE DATA WE GATHERED FOR IT, BOTH FROM A POLICY STANDPOINT AND AN ECONOMIC STANDPOINT, WAS COMPREHENSIVE, WHAT DOES IT COST TO INVEST IN COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ACCESS, AND THEN WHAT'S THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT, BOTH IN HEALTH AND SAVINGS, WILL CAPTURE A LOT OF THE WORK THAT WAS PART OF THE AAPI COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER STUDY, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE OUR KEY PARTNER IN THAT WAS A KEY CONTRIBUTOR TO THE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER STUDY THAT CAME OUT OF THE LATINO HEALTH ASSESSMENT. SO YOU WILL SEE IN THAT REPORT POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS, INVESTMENT IDEAS, AND MAPPING
OF WHAT EXISTS ALREADY, THAT DOES OVERLAP VERY SIGNIFICANTLY WITH WHAT WE THINK OUR BOTH THE EXISTING AAPI COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER PROGRAM LED TO AND HOW TO SUSTAIN IT, AS WELL AS WHERE IT COULD GO FROM HERE.
WHAT
I WILL SAY IS BECAUSE OF THE FOCUS ON THE LATINO COMMUNITY,
SOME
OF THE WHAT WOULD IT COST TO INVEST AND EXPAND IN CERTAIN WAYS ARE FOCUSED BY NEIGHBORHOOD, NOT NECESSARILY BY RACE AND ETHNICITY, BUT ON THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAD HIGHER RATES OF LATINO COMMUNITY MEMBERS OR SOME OF THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT WERE CALLED OUT OTHERWISE IN LATINO HEALTH ASSESSMENT.
SO
THERE MAY BE SOME PIECES THAT DON'T TRANSLATE EXACTLY,
BUT
OTHERS THAT I THINK WILL BE HUGELY BENEFICIAL.
SO
ULTIMATELY, I THINK THERE WILL BE SOME REALLY VALUABLE INSIGHTS ABOUT HOW TO SUSTAIN AND GROW THE AAPI COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COMPONENT COMING IN THAT REPORT.
GREAT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. APPRECIATE THAT.
THANK YOU, CHAIR.
THANK YOU. DR. TORRELL.
HI,
GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR LEE, SUPERVISOR ABEAKOGA. YOU HAVE OUR WRITTEN REPORT.
THIS
RESPONDS TO SUPERVISOR LEE'S REQUEST LAST MONTH FOR AN UPDATE ON CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT. SO WE PROVIDED SOME UPDATES ON THE PROGRAM,
THE
NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEING SERVED,
AS
WELL AS JUST HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES.
SO
OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
THANK YOU.
ALL
RIGHT, NEXT I THINK IS
LAURA.
HI.
OOPS, YOUR MIC'S NOT ON YET. LET'S TRY ONE MORE TIME.
SORRY.
THANK YOU, SUPERVISOR LEE AND SUPERVISOR ABEAKOGA. YOU HAVE OUR WRITTEN REPORT, SO PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
OKAY. NO QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, MOVING ALONG. NOW I THINK WE HAVE OUR BERT MCGULLIN, FROM MCGULLIN GROUP, IS HERE TO GIVE A REPORT REGARDING FEDERAL AND STATE HEALTH POLICY AND BUDGET LANDSCAPE. GOOD AFTERNOON.
GOOD AFTERNOON.
YES,
HAPPY TO BE HERE TO REPORT OUT ON THESE DEVELOPMENTS IN WASHINGTON. LET ME START WITH THE
LIMITED GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN THAT'S UNDERWAY, THAT WAS TRIGGERED BY THE FAILURE TO PASS THE HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATION. 260 ,000 DHS EMPLOYEES ARE INVOLVED. 90 % OF THEM, THOUGH, ARE STILL WORKING, MOST OF THEM WITHOUT PAY, BUT 90 % ARE STILL ON THE JOB BECAUSE OF THE ESSENTIAL NATURE OF MUCH OF THEIR WORK. THERE APPEARS TO BE NO IMMEDIATE PROSPECT FOR A DEAL, ALTHOUGH THERE ARE NEGOTIATIONS UNDER WAY. AS EVERYONE HERE KNOWS, THIS SHUTDOWN OR THIS FAILURE TO PASS THE BILL, WHICH LED TO THE SHUTDOWN, WAS TRIGGERED BY DEMOCRATIC CONCERNS ABOUT MISCONDUCT BY ICE OFFICERS, AND THE WHITE HOUSE AND SENATE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING BACK AND FORTH. THERE ARE OFFERS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE TO DO THINGS
LIKE INSTALL BODY CAMERAS OR IMPLEMENT A BODY CAMERA PROCESS, BUT THEY SAY THINGS LIKE THEY'RE GOING TO INCREASE THE USE OF BODY CAMERAS. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? DOES THAT MEAN YOU GO FROM 1 % TO 6 %? THE SENATE DEMOCRATS WANT EVERYONE TO WEAR A BODY CAMERA. IT'S THOSE KINDS OF ISSUES THAT STILL SEPARATE THEM OUT.
SO THAT NEGOTIATION IS UNDERWAY. BUT THAT'S SORT OF QUIET NEGOTIATION. THE LOUDER AND MORE PUBLIC DEBATE IN WASHINGTON THAT STARTED YESTERDAY IS ABOUT THE SAVE ACT, WHICH IS THE REPUBLICAN EFFORT TO MAKE REGISTERING TO VOTE AND ACTUALLY VOTING MUCH MORE DIFFICULT THROUGH RIGID, NEW, AND EXTRAORDINARY REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE DESIGNED TO REDUCE THE UNIVERSE OF VOTERS IN A WAY THAT REPUBLICANS THINK WILL BENEFIT THEIR PARTY IN THE 2026 ELECTION. THE SAVE ACT HAS NEXT TO ZERO CHANCE OF PASSAGE BECAUSE OF THE SENATE'S 60 -VOTE THRESHOLD. BUT UNDER PRESSURE FROM THE PRESIDENT, THERE'S NOW A SENATOR, THE REPUBLICAN LEADER HAS STARTED A DEBATE ON THE FLOOR WHERE FOR MANY DAYS, PERHAPS FOR A WEEK OR TWO, THERE
WILL BE A BACK AND FORTH IN WHICH THE SENATE WILL BE MADE AND THE HOPE BY SOON IS THAT THAT WILL SATISFY THE PRESIDENT AND IN THE END, HE KNOWS THERE AREN'T 60 VOTES FOR PASSAGE AND THE BILL WILL DIE. PRESIDENT TRUMP AND OTHERS WANT SOMETHING CALLED A TALKING FILIBUSTER WHICH WOULD ACTUALLY INVOLVE POTENTIALLY MONTHS OF DEBATE ON THE SENATE FLOOR. AND THE THEORY BEHIND A TALKING FILIBUSTER IS THAT THE DEMOCRATS WOULD AT SOME POINT BREAK DOWN AND NO LONGER BE ABLE TO HOLD THE SENATE FLOOR AND THEREFORE ON A 51 -VOTE POSITION, THE BASIS THIS BILL COULD BE PASSED, THERE'S I THINK NO WAY THAT DEMOCRATS WILL BE LESS RESOLUTE THAN THE REPUBLICANS IN
A TALKING FILIBUSTER. SO EVEN IF THAT WAS TO BE PURSUED, THE ODDS OF SUCCESS FOR THE SAVE BILL ARE AGAIN CLOSE TO ZERO. SO WHILE THE PARTIAL SHUTDOWN DRAGS ON, A BIT OF POSITIVE NEWS, ALTHOUGH IT'S VERY MINOR, IS THAT THE SENATE IS CONTINUING TO PROCESS THE FY27 BUDGET BILLS IN SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS. THERE'S A NORMAL BIPARTISAN PROCESS UNDERWAY. HARD TO KNOW AT WHAT POINT THAT GOES OFF THE RAILS, IF AT ALL, BUT THAT'S CURRENTLY ON THE RAILS AND MOVING FORWARD. ANOTHER BUDGET ITEM I NEED TO REPORT ON THAT HAS POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR OUR HEALTH SYSTEM AND OUR HEALTH FUNDING INVOLVES BUDGET RECONCILIATION. YOU MAY RECALL THAT AT A PREVIOUS HHC MEETING, I SAID THAT PRESIDENT
TRUMP HAD TAKEN BUDGET RECONCILIATION, WHICH WAS THE VEHICLE USED LAST YEAR TO PASS H .R. 1, WHICH HAS DONE SO MUCH DAMAGE TO THE MEDICAID PROGRAM AND TO CALIFORNIA IN GENERAL AND THE NATION IN GENERAL WHEN IT COMES TO ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE. IT'S THE 51 -VOTE VEHICLE, VEHICLE 51 VOTES TO THE SENATE. WELL, THE PRESIDENT SAID IT WAS OFF THE TABLE A MONTH AGO. I DID SAY AT THE TIME THIS PRESIDENT IS KNOWN TO OCCASIONALLY CHANGE HIS MIND, AND THAT WAS, I SAID AT THE TIME, AN OBVIOUS UNDERSTATEMENT. WELL, UNFORTUNATELY, RECONCILIATION IS BACK ON THE TABLE FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS. ONE FACTOR IS THE HOUSE REPORTED THAT REPUBLICANS AT THEIR RETREAT A FEW
WEEKS AGO HAD A DEBATE ABOUT THIS, AND THERE'S A BLOCK OF HOUSE REPUBLICANS WHO WANT MORE TAX CUTTING. THEY THINK THAT IF THEY CAN DO MORE TAX CUTTING, WHICH YOU NEED RECONCILIATION TO DO, THEY 'LL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL ARGUMENT TO MAKE IN THE MIDTERMS. AN EXAMPLE OF THE KIND OF TAXES THEY WANT TO CUT INVOLVES PROVIDING HELP FOR FIRST -TIME HOME BUYERS, ISSUES LIKE THAT. SO THEY WANT IT ON THE TABLE. BUT THE OTHER MORE COMPELLING FACTOR MAY BE THE NEED TO PAY FOR THE WAR WITH IRAN. DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE WAR, A SUPPLEMENTAL MAY BE NEEDED TO PAY. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW THE COST OF THIS WAR. BUDGET EXPERTS ARE ESTIMATING IT
COULD BE BETWEEN $50 AND $100 BILLION IF IT GOES ONLY A FEW MORE WEEKS AND NO ONE KNOWS HOW LONG IT'S GOING TO GO. GETTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BILL, A STAND -ALONE SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE CONGRESS WILL BE INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT. WEAVING THAT INTO THE APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS WILL BE EQUALLY DIFFICULT. SO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS, REPUBLICANS MAY TURN TO A RECONCILIATION BILL. THE DANGER, OF COURSE, WITH RECONCILIATION FROM OUR VANTAGE POINT IS THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE OFFSETTING CUTS. SO IF THEY TRY TO PAY FOR THE WAR WITH IRAN, WITH RECONCILIATION, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO FIND CUTS. AND, AGAIN, OUR HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS, ALREADY CUT IN A VERY SEVERE AND DAMAGING MANNER, ARE ONCE AGAIN VULNERABLE. NOW,
THE ARGUMENT AGAINST RECONCILIATION HAPPENING, WHICH IS WHAT WAS MOTIVATING PRESIDENT TRUMP, STILL STANDS, AND THAT IS THE REPUBLICANS, EVEN THOUGH YOU CAN PASS IT ON A PARTY -LINE BASIS, THEY HAVE RAZOR -THIN MARGINS IN BOTH THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE. EVEN IF THE WILL IS THERE TO DO RECONCILIATION, IT'S GOING TO BE HARD FOR THEM TO GET THAT DONE. ON THE HEALTH FRONT, A COUPLE OF ITEMS WORTH NOTING, ONE OF WHICH DR. RUDMAN HAS ALREADY REFERENCED, AND THAT'S THE MASSACHUSETTS FEDERAL COURT DECISION, WHICH WAS REALLY VERY GOOD NEWS. THE LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY THE ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS TO BLOCK HHS FROM MOVING AHEAD WITH THESE COVID, NOT COVID, VACCINE POLICIES, INCLUDING COVID AND CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATIONS. WHAT
WAS ESPECIALLY HEARTENING ABOUT THAT DECISION IS THAT THIS JUDGE VERY DIRECTLY TOOK ON THE FACT THAT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE WITHOUT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, JUST STATING PLAIN FACTS. WHERE'S THE SCIENCE? IT'S NOT THERE. BUT HE WENT BEYOND THAT TO ALSO VALIDATE THE NOTION THAT THE COMMITTEE THAT RECOMMENDED REVIEWS THESE DECISIONS, THE ASEP COMMITTEE, IS COMPOSED NOW OF A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO BACKGROUND IN VACCINE MEDICINE OR SCIENCE. SO YOU 'VE GOT NO EVIDENCE BEING REVIEWED BY PEOPLE WITHOUT EXPERTISE, AND THIS JUDGE, AND IT WAS HEARTENING TO READ THIS, TO HEAR THIS SAID, THAT MAKES NO SENSE. NOW, IT'S GOING TO BE APPEALED, AND WE KNOW THAT IN THE COURT SYSTEM, YOU KNOW, THIS MAY
AT SOME POINT BE OVERTURNED, BUT IT WAS A GOOD DEVELOPMENT. AND IT ACTUALLY, THIS WHOLE VACCINE CHAOS HAS HAD ANOTHER POTENTIALLY USEFUL IMPACT ON HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES IN THAT THE WHITE HOUSE ENGAGED IN A SHAKEUP OF HHS LEADERSHIP, NOT RFK JR. HE'S STILL THERE. BUT SOME OF THE PEOPLE BELOW HIM RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME OF THIS CHAOTIC, NON -SYSTEMATIC, NON -SCIENTIFIC DECISION MAKING HAVE LEFT. AND THERE'S A MAN NAMED CHRIS CLOMP WHO WAS IN CHARGE OF CMS WHO'S NOW BEEN GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY AS THE COUNSELOR, CHIEF COUNSELOR FOR HHS FOR THE BROADER OPERATIONS OF THE AGENCY. AND HE'S DESCRIBED AS PRAGMATIC AND APOLITICAL. AND, AGAIN, THERE MAY BE A DESIRE TO HAVE A MORE RATIONAL DECISION
-MAKING PROCESS. AGAIN, WE'RE NOT OUT OF THE WOODS, BUT FAR FROM IT. BUT IT'S JUST WORTH NOTING THAT THERE'S BEEN SOME, FINALLY SOME REACTION TO SOME OF THESE VERY IRRATIONAL DECISIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE IN D .C.
SO
WE 'LL SEE HOW THIS ALL PLAYS OUT ON THE VACCINE FRONT IN HHS. I WANT TO CONCLUDE BY COMMENTING BRIEFLY ON WHAT'S HAPPENED IN THE STATE LEVEL IN THAT WE ALL KNOW THAT GOVERNOR NEWSOM'S BUDGET IN JANUARY DID VERY LITTLE TO RESPOND TO THE IMPACT OF H .R .1. AND THAT SANTA CLARA COUNTY, OTHER COUNTIES, OTHER ASSOCIATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE HAVE BEEN DEVELOPING STRATEGIES AND ADVOCACY PLANS TO INSIST THIS YEAR THAT THERE BE ATTENTION PAID TO MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF H .R .1. NOT NEXT YEAR, BUT THIS YEAR BECAUSE THE IMPACT IS SO SEVERE. SO COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, ALONG WITH ANOTHER COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, A NUMBER OF OTHER PLAYERS, HAS PUT FORWARD MULTIPLE
ASKS JUST TO BRIEFLY REMIND US ALL AS TO WHAT THEY ARE. WE WANT THE SELF -FINANCING BY COUNTIES OF THE NONFEDERAL SHARE OF IN -PATIENT FEE -FOR -SERVICE MEDICAL
TO
BE DONE AWAY WITH. WHAT THAT SIMPLY MEANS IS FOR 20 YEARS
COUNTIES
LIKE SANTA CLARA IN WHAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A STATE FEDERAL MATCHING PROGRAM HAVE PUT UP OUR RESOURCES TO DRAW DOWN THE MATCH, DIMINISHING MONEY THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE AVAILABLE TO SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND TO THE TUNE OF $500 MILLION WHERE THE CAPH, OUR STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION, WITH THE SUPPORT OF SANTA CLARA IS SAYING THAT HAS TO STOP AND WE HAVE TO START THAT NEW PROCESS OF HAVING THE STATE PUT UP THE MATCH, THE STATE DO THE INVESTMENT NOW BECAUSE THE MECHANISMS WE 'VE USED FOR 20 YEARS TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS OF THAT STATE MATCH ARE GOING AWAY. THEY WERE THE TARGETS OF HR1. SECOND ISSUE INVOLVES ELIGIBILITY WORKERS. WE KNOW THAT HR1 IS ALL
ABOUT MAKING IT HARDER TO BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL, HARDER TO BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR CALFRESH. WE NEED SUBSTANTIAL NEW RESOURCES TO STRENGTHEN THAT WHOLE ELIGIBILITY SYSTEM AND THE COUNTY STRONGLY BEHIND THAT ASK THAT'S BEING ADVANCED. AND THERE'S ALSO AN ADDITIONAL MAJOR ASK INVOLVING A MINIMUM OF $2 BILLION FROM THE STATE. THAT'S THE MINIMUM NUMBER THAT THE COUNTY HAS PUT FORWARD TO ADDRESS THE INCREASE IN INDIGENT CARE AND THE NUMBER OF UNINSURED WHO WILL COME TO THE COUNTY ONCE THE FULL IMPACT OF HR1 IS FELT AND PEOPLE STARTING NOW, BUT IT WILL BE EVEN STRONGER OVER TIME AS THE IMPACT OF HR1 IS FELT AND PEOPLE NO LONGER CAN EITHER AFFORD CARE OR BECAUSE OF THESE ELIGIBILITY
RESTRICTIONS AND HURDLES THEY LOSE THEIR COVERAGE AND NOW THEY'RE UNINSURED OR INDIGENT AND IT'S A MINIMUM OF $2 BILLION STATEWIDE. SO THERE ARE MULTIPLE ASKS. I BELIEVE THAT MR. WILLIAMS IS GOING TO BE TESTIFYING TOMORROW BEFORE THE STATE SENATE AND HE CAN MAYBE TELL YOU MORE ABOUT THAT TO ADVANCE THESE ISSUES AND OTHERS, BUT AGAIN THAT'S SOMETHING JUST WORTH NOTING IN THAT THIS IS A MAJOR BATTLE AND THE STAKES ARE VERY HIGH FOR THE COUNTY.
YES,
I WILL BE IN SACRAMENTO TOMORROW TESTIFYING FOR A SENATE COMMITTEE REGARDING THE HR1 IMPACTS. WE 'VE HAD A VERY STRONG AND VISIBLE PRESENCE. WE ARE PURSUING OUR THREE -PART STRATEGY OF STATE LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO PUSH BACK ON HR1 AND INCLUDING MAINTAINING PEOPLE ON MEDICAL ENROLLMENT, SUPPORTING PUBLIC HOSPITAL SYSTEMS AND REVISITING THE STATE COUNTY FISCAL RELATIONSHIP RELATED TO INDIGENT CARE. WE ARE HOPING THAT A VERY STRONG COALITION THAT INCLUDES CSAC, URBAN COUNTIES CAUCUS, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HOSPITALS AND MANY OTHERS WILL SOON BE COMING TOGETHER VERY PUBLICLY IN SUPPORT OF BASICALLY THOSE SAME PRONGS.
AND
WE 'LL BE PUSHING FORWARD PUSHING THAT VERY STRONGLY. I THINK WE HAVE GOTTEN OVERALL A VERY POSITIVE RECEPTION
ON THE
PART OF LEGISLATORS WHO I THINK RECOGNIZE HOW CRITICAL THESE SERVICES ARE AND HAVE BEEN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT CALIFORNIANS ARE NOW RANKING HEALTHCARE COVERAGE AND AFFORDABILITY AS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CONCERN, ACTUALLY SIGNIFICANTLY OUTPACING HOUSING AND RENT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN MANY YEARS AS THE TOP CONCERN FOR CALIFORNIANS. AND THAT'S BEFORE WE HAVE ACTUALLY SEEN A LOT OF PEOPLE LOSE MEDICAL COVERAGE WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WORK RULE REQUIREMENTS. SO THIS IS JUST REALLY WHAT WE'RE SEEING FROM THE IMMEDIATE IMPACTS AND FROM THE IMPACTS ON THE HEALTH EXCHANGE AS A RESULT OF THE CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS NOT EXTENDING THE SUBSIDIES. SO THIS IS OUR TOP PRIORITY AND FOCUS AREA. WE'RE GOING TO KEEP PUSHING
HARD ON IT AND WE WILL BE PUSHING ALL PIECES OF THAT APPROACH.
THAT
COMPLETES MY REPORT. THANK YOU, MR. GOLDEN. VICE CHAIR, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE?
OH, YES. GO AHEAD. OH, SORRY. PUBLIC SPEAKERS. HOW MANY DO WE HAVE? I
HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK ON ITEM EIGHT. TWO
MINUTES. OUR
SPEAKER IS ON ZOOM. WE 'LL OPEN YOUR MICROPHONE, PARENT. YOU 'LL HAVE TWO MINUTES TO SPEAK.
PLEASE GO AHEAD. YES.
GOOD AFTERNOON TO YOU ALL. BEFORE WE START DOING OUR OWN POSTING AWARDS ON THE WALL, I THINK WE NEED TO RECOGNIZE THE SEVERE ISSUE WE HAVE HERE WHEN IT COMES TO CHILD ABUSE AND WHEN IT COMES TO PROVIDING SCREENINGS FOR CHILDREN WHO REPORTED BEING ABUSED. I MEAN, MY OWN KIDS ARE BEING SEXUALLY MOLESTED. MY SON, HE'S CONFIRMED THAT MY EX -WIFE WAS LETTING A MAN RAPE FROM BEGINNING AT THE AGE OF 13. THEY 'VE BEEN UNNECESSARILY BATHING WITH THE CHILDREN. AND THERE WAS SEXUAL CONTACT BETWEEN TWO OF MY CHILDREN. I HAD TO SEPARATE THEM A FEW TIMES. IT JUST SCREAMS. LET'S DO A SCREENING FOR THE CHILDREN. WHY LET THE ABUSE CONTINUE? BECAUSE IF THE
SCREENING NEVER OCCURS, YOU GUYS TREAT IT AS IF THE ABUSE IS NOT HAPPENING. AND IT'S LIKE A SICK PRACTICAL JOKE TO DENY MY KIDS A SCREENING. I MEAN, YOU'RE ALL IN ON IT. YOU ALL KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. I MEAN, HOW MANY MEETINGS HAVE I BEEN TO? I MEAN, HOW MANY E -MAILS HAVE I WRITTEN? I MEAN, NOBODY CARES. NOBODY HERE IN THIS ROOM CARES. I MEAN, LIKE, THE ONLY E -MAIL I 'VE EVER RECEIVED BACK WAS FROM WENDY AND SHE WROTE ONE LINE. SHE SAID, IF YOU WANT TO FILE A COMPLAINT, YOU CAN FILE A COMPLAINT WITH OUR COMPLAINTS DIVISION. SHE DIDN'T SAY SHE WAS CONCERNED. SHE DIDN'T SAY, I'M SORRY, THIS IS HAPPENING.
NONE OF THAT. AND IT'S JUST, I TELL YOU GUYS, IT'S NOT SAFE TO RAISE A FAMILY HERE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY. IF YOU'RE SINGLE, THAT'S OKAY. BUT IF YOU HAVE CHILDREN, I BELIEVE WE SHOULD TELL EVERYBODY TO MOVE, TO GET OUT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY. BECAUSE IF YOUR CHILDREN GET RAPED OR IF YOUR CHILDREN GET PHYSICALLY ABUSED OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, THE COUNTY IS JUST GOING TO IGNORE YOU. THEY'RE GOING TO PRETEND LIKE NOTHING HAPPENED. THEY'RE GOING TO BLAME IT ALL ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IT'S THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S FAULT THAT CHILDREN ARE GETTING RAPED. I MEAN, THAT'S ALL I'M HEARING HERE. YOU GUYS ARE PERFECT, AND IT'S EVERYBODY ELSE'S FAULT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENT. THANK
YOU. MR. AGON, RELATED TO ALL THE FEDERAL NEGOTIATION WE TALKED ABOUT, WE HEARD ABOUT, LIKE YOU SAID, THE DHS FUNDING BEING HELD UP AND THAT WE ARE SEEING LONG LINES AT THE AIRPORT RIGHT NOW FOR THOSE WORKERS, WHICH IS EXTREMELY UNFORTUNATE. AT THIS POINT, YOU REALLY DON'T SEE AN END TO THIS, DO YOU? I
THINK THEY'RE NOT THIS WEEK, NOT TOMORROW, BUT THERE IS A NEGOTIATION GOING ON, AND BOTH SIDES ARE STARTING TO MAKE SOME SMALL CONCESSIONS, SO I THINK AT SOME POINT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE LONG LINES, AS THE PRESIDENT SAID, THE PRESSURE BUILDS, AND FOR OTHER REASONS, THERE COULD BE AN END TO IT. IT'S JUST TAKING LONGER THAN ANYONE WOULD LIKE, AND THE ADMINISTRATION RESISTANCE TO HAVING THINGS LIKE BODY CAMERAS REQUIRED FOR ALL THE OFFICERS, WHY NOT FOR ALL OF THEM? WHY INCREASING WITHOUT SPECIFYING HOW MANY ARE GOING TO ACTUALLY HAVE TO WEAR THEM? IT'S THINGS LIKE THAT THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE FOUND FRUSTRATING, BUT AGAIN, THEY'RE TALKING TO EACH OTHER. THEY'RE EXCHANGING PROPOSALS. SO SOMETHING COULD HAPPEN
IN THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS OR WEEK OR TWO. SO
THE ADVICE IS GET TO THE AIRPORT EARLY IF IT'S FLY.
YES. I DID THAT THIS MORNING WHEN I FLEW UP HERE, BY THE WAY. I WAS THERE EARLY FOR THAT REASON, AND ACTUALLY OVERHEARD SOME TSA OFFICERS TALKING ABOUT HOW DIFFICULT LIFE WAS FOR THEM DURING THE SHUTDOWN, AND IT'S OBVIOUSLY SORT OF A TRAGEDY FOR THE WORKFORCE, AND WE NEED TO GET THIS RESOLVED. ABSOLUTELY.
OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. GULIN. THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. I THINK IF THIS POINT IS ACTUALLY BRINGING US TO THE END OF OUR MEETING, CORRECT? YEAH. AND THANK YOU FOR EVERYBODY THAT WORKED ON THIS, ADMIN AND THE CLERK STAFF. THE NEXT HXC MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15TH, TAX DAY, AT 2 P .M. RIGHT HERE, SAME CHANNEL, SAME SPACE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AND NOW THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED.